BARRIER MEMBRANES FOR DENTAL APPLICATIONS: A REVIEW AND SWEET ADVANCEMENT IN MEMBRANE DEVELOPMENTS

Rodriguez IA1#*, Selders GS2#, Fetz AE2, Gehrmann CJ2, Stein SH3, Evensky JA3, Green MS4 and Bowlin GL2 1SweetBio Inc., 20 Dudley St., Suite 900, Memphis, TN, 38103, USA 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Memphis, 330 Engineering Technology Bldg, 3806 Norriswood Avenue, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA 3Department of Periodontology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-College of Dentistry, 875 Union Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, USA 4Department of Periodontology, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, 1 Kneeland Street, Boston, MA, 02111, USA #denotes equal contribution

Abstract

Aim: The following review explores the evolution of barrier membranes in oral/periodontal surgical procedures while highlighting the rationale utilized for their development and continued innovative expansion. Materials and methods: This review is based on systemic reviews (when available) and comparative in vitro, in vivo, and human studies. Results: Studies show that alveolar ridge/socket preservation following tooth loss/extraction significantly reduces the need for further augmentation at the time of implant placement when compared to unassisted socket healing procedures. With a broad spectrum of barrier membranes clinically available, it is essential to review the advantages and disadvantages of current designs, and those developing within the field. Conclusion: Advantageous and “sweet” developments, such as conformable moisture-retaining Manuka honey incorporated membranes and those containing prohealing and anti-inflammatory substances for wound healing and infection prevention may be the driving factor compelling surgeons to incorporate ridge preservation into their post-extraction routines.

CLICK HERE TO CHECK THE COMPLETE ARTICLE