Primary Stability of Three Different Osteotomy Techniques in Medullary Bone: An in Vitro Study

Ferdinando Attanasio, Alessandro Antonelli * , Ylenia Brancaccio, Fiorella Averta, Michele Mario Figliuzzi, Leonzio Fortunato and Amerigo Giudice
Department of Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy;
Copyright: © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Abstract

Background: The aim of this in vitro study was to analyse the primary stability of 20 implants placed with Twist drills (TD) versus 20 implants placed with Summers osteotomes (SO) and 20 implants placed with B&B bone compactors (BC) in medullary bone (quality type III and type IV). Methods: The implants were placed in 10 fresh pig ribs fixed on a bench vice in order to avoid micro-movements during surgical procedures and measure recording. Peak insertion torque (PIT) and Peak removal torque (PRT) were recorded with MGT-12 digital torque gauge and ISQ was recorded through OSSTELL ISQ— device by an independent operator. Results: Comparing our data
(Tukey test p = 0.05), it was evidenced a statistically significant dierence in the PIT between TD and BC groups (p = 0.01). Analysing ISQ data, there was a statistically significant dierence between the TD and BC groups (p = 0.0001) and between the SO and BC groups (p = 0.014). The analysis of PRT evidenced a statistically significant dierence between the TD and BC groups (p = 0.038). Conclusions: This study evidenced that bone compactor preparation can positively influence primary implant stability (PS), however further in vivo studies and a larger sample are necessary to assess the usefulness in several clinical settings.

CLICK HERE TO CHECK THE COMPLETE ARTICLE

VUOI SAPERNE DI PIÙ?

CONTATTACI!